The California Department of Fair Housing and Employment has a list of questions and answers for workers who are concerned about sexual harassment in the workplace. The best course ofRead MoreFrequently Asked Questions about Sexual Harassment. When is Training Required?
Uber Settles California Employee Classification Lawsuit for $20 Million
According to a March 2019 report by Bloomberg, Uber Technologies Inc. has agreed to pay $20 million to settle claims by workers that they should have been classified as employeesRead MoreUber Settles California Employee Classification Lawsuit for $20 Million
Strategic Considerations to Consider in Employee Rights Claims
We discuss many employment issues in our Youtube videos. A video which discusses the topics in this blog can be found – here. Other defendants – for settlement or litigationRead MoreStrategic Considerations to Consider in Employee Rights Claims
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Wins $458,000 Age Discrimination Case
The EEOC reported on September 26, 2019 that a jury composed of nine members, In Brooklyn, entered a verdict for the EEOC against AZ Metro Distributors, LLC, on behalf ofRead MoreEqual Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Wins $458,000 Age Discrimination Case
Employers Shouldn’t Be Able to Use Severance Agreements to Bypass Employee Rights to Whistleblower Awards
Employers Shouldn’t Be Able to Use Severance Agreements to Bypass Employee Rights to Whistleblower Awards and the Right to File Whistleblower Retaliation Claims Employees who file whistleblower claims need toRead MoreEmployers Shouldn’t Be Able to Use Severance Agreements to Bypass Employee Rights to Whistleblower Awards
The Causes of Action Against Defendants in Wrongful Employment Discharge Cases
In the case of the employee who was terminated by Mattel, Inc. after nearly 50 years of service, there are numerous legal causes of actions that our employment lawyers asserted.Read MoreThe Causes of Action Against Defendants in Wrongful Employment Discharge Cases
New Wrongful Termination Case Filed Against Mattel By Danz Law
In a recent case, our firm filed an employment termination case in LA Superior Court. The case asserts that the plaintiff who worked for a company, Mattel, Inc. for justRead MoreNew Wrongful Termination Case Filed Against Mattel By Danz Law
Supreme Court Announces It Will Decide if the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Applies to Gay and Transgender Workers
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is one of the principal laws that employees can use to hold employers accountable for discrimination in the workplace. The lawRead MoreSupreme Court Announces It Will Decide if the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Applies to Gay and Transgender Workers
Supreme Court Invalidates Class Action Lawsuit on the Basis It Wasn’t Expressly Authorized
The trend of the US Supreme Court to make it harder for consumers and employers accountable continued with a 5-4 decision in the case of Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela.Read MoreSupreme Court Invalidates Class Action Lawsuit on the Basis It Wasn’t Expressly Authorized
New Ninth Circuit Ruling Applies Dynamex Decision Retroactively – Making It Hard to Say Workers aren’t Employees
The San Francisco Chronicle reported on May 2, 2019, that the California Supreme Court Dynamex decision can be applied retroactively. Dynamex changed the rules in the new gig economy –Read MoreNew Ninth Circuit Ruling Applies Dynamex Decision Retroactively – Making It Hard to Say Workers aren’t Employees